• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • 215-886-1266

Law Office of Joanne Kleiner

  • Home
  • Attorney Profile
  • We Can Help
  • Family Law & Divorce
    • Collaborative Law
    • Contested Divorce
    • Equitable Distribution of Property
    • High Asset / Net Worth Divorce
    • Mediation
    • Property Settlement Agreements
    • Spousal Support
  • Client Reviews
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Search

Same Sex Marriage

Sep 05

Pennsylvania Court Allows Same-Sex Divorce

Pennsylvania Court Allows Same-Sex DivorceCommonwealth courts in Pennsylvania must give equal legal status to same-sex marriages legally entered into in other states before Pennsylvania law sanctioned gay marriage, according to an opinion by a Pennsylvania Superior Court panel. The ruling, handed down on December 28, 2016, actually addressed whether parties to a same-sex union that was performed in Vermont could seek to end the legal relationship in Pennsylvania. The court said they could.

In the matter before the court, the parties, two women who entered into a civil union in Vermont in 2002, sought to terminate the legal relationship, but ran into a hurdle when a Philadelphia County family court judge asserted that she lacked authority to dissolve the union. Senior Judge James J. Fitzgerald, writing for the panel, concluded that Pennsylvania must consider Vermont civil unions the same manner as marriages approved under Pennsylvania law. He further ruled that, if Pennsylvania marriage laws apply to the union, so do Pennsylvania divorce laws.

The parties to the divorce action, Freyda Neyman and Florence Buckley, entered into a civil union in Vermont when that state was the only one in the country that permitted same-sex unions. At the time, Vermont did not use the term “marriage” to refer to same-sex unions. The state officially applied the term “marriage” to same-sex unions in 2009.

Buckley and Neyman stayed together only five months. When they sought a legal ruling in Pennsylvania in 2014 to terminate their civil union, their request was denied by Judge Margaret Theresa Murphy, who ruled that, pursuant to Pennsylvania law, she could only grant divorces to couples who were bound “in matrimony.”

Contact Attorney Joanne E. Kleiner

Let us help you protect your rights. Contact our office online or call us at 215-886-1266 to schedule a confidential consultation. We will help you stay focused on the issues that matter.

Jan 16

Pennsylvania High Court Allows Termination of “Gay Adoptions”

Because of a recent decision by the Pennsylvania Superior Court, many gay couples who had used adoption as a legal strategy will now be able to get married. Here’s how it works.

Gay Adoptions

Prior to the 2014 ruling that invalidated Pennsylvania’s Defense of Marriage Act, gay couples in Pennsylvania frequently used adoption as a means of protecting inheritance rights. However, under state laws, a person could not marry someone he had adopted, so those same couples had to seek to have their adoptions dissolved before they could marry. Many of them ran into obstacles, as judges frequently held that the state’s adoption laws did not allow for the termination or dissolution of an adoption, absent a showing of fraud or misrepresentation.

In a decision handed down on Wednesday, December 21, the state’s high court ruled that Pennsylvania allows an “unopposed annulment or revocation of an adult adoption.” The parties to the lawsuit, who have been in a committed relationship since 1970, are a 69-year-old man and his 80-year-old partner. They had asked the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas to dissolve their adoption in June of 2015, but the court said it lacked the authority to do so under state law.

The court acknowledged that other states, with similar adoption provisions, had permitted adult adoptions to be dissolved under similar circumstances. The court remanded the matter to the Allegheny Court of Common Pleas with instructions to terminate the adoption, so that the parties can get married. The parties to the lawsuit said they thought the matter was a lost cause, as the high court had taken a long time to return a decision.

Contact the Law Office of Joanne E. Kleiner & Associates

For an appointment, contact our office online or call us at 215-886-1266. Let us use our experience, skill, knowledge and resources to help you make informed and effective decisions.

Jul 09

Supreme Court Decision in Alabama Same-Sex Marriage Case Sends Message

Is Justice Thomas Correct? Is Supreme Court Clearing Way for Same Sex Marriage?

Two men holding handsIn a scathing dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas of the United States Supreme Court complained that the high court’s refusal to block the ruling in a federal district in Alabama, invalidating that state’s ban on same-sex marriage was tantamount to paving the way for gay marriage nationwide. Many legal experts agree. Judge Callie V.S. Granade, of the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Alabama, held the state’s laws prohibiting same-sex marriage to violate the U.S. Constitution.

Legal authorities across the country believe that Thomas is correct, that in light of its recent actions, the Supreme Court has decided not to interfere with the trend toward nationwide legalization of same-sex marriage. In the last six months, the high court has refused to hear appeals from numerous states where same-sex marriage bans were found to be unconstitutional. During that time period, the number of states permitting same-sex marriage has grown from 19 to 37.

Though the high court has ruled on the Alabama law, the matter is far from settled there. In actions reminiscent of the state’s belligerent opposition to civil right in the 1960s, top public officials have ordered probate judges to ignore the Supreme Court ruling. Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy S. Moore ordered Alabama probate judges on Sunday not to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. Thus far, probate judges in 52 of Alabama’s 67 counties have complied with Judge Moore’s order. Many same-sex marriages were held, though, in the 15 counties where license were issued.

In Justice Thomas’s dissent, he contended that the Supreme Court decision, in United States v. Windsor, which in 2013 invalidated some provisions of the federal Defense of Marriage Act as unconstitutional, did not resolve all issues. He argued that the status quo should have remained in effect in Alabama until those questions were addressed by the high court. In his opinion, the court’s refusal to hear appeals amounted to “acquiescence” and “a signal of the court’s intended resolution of the question.”

Contact the Law Office of Joanne E. Kleiner & Associates

Let us help you successfully resolve your family law problems. To schedule an appointment with an experienced Pennsylvania family law attorney, contact our office online or call us at 215-886-1266.

Jun 24, 2015

Same Sex Divorce Follows Same Sex Marriage

Same – Sex Marriages No Different – Some Work and Some Don’t

In a study conducted by the Williams Institute, through the University of California at Los Angeles, researchers concluded that, while same-sex divorce rates are currently lower than in heterosexual marriages, the rates will probably be comparable within about 10 years.

The study considered about 150,000 same-sex couples–the number that had filed legal documents for either marriage, domestic partnership or same-sex civil unions. Officials say that this represents about 20% of those who acknowledged in census reports that they were living in a same-sex relationship. According to the study, about one percent of those who had filed some type of registration had subsequently sought to legally dissolve the relationship (compared with two percent of heterosexual marriages that annually end in divorce).

Researchers believe, however, that the divorce rate among same-sex couples will continue to rise and will likely equal that of heterosexual marriages within a few years. They argue that the first group of gay marriages were typically among people who had been partners for extended periods of time, so there was already a dynamic of partnership and longevity. Accordingly, most parties to same-sex marriage have been older, more financially stable, and more emotionally mature. However, as same-sex marriage becomes a legally and socially acceptable option, it will naturally involve more and more people with the same problems that lead to heterosexual divorce–immaturity, lack of financial resources, and lack of commitment.

Researchers noted that the numbers may be somewhat skewed, as until recently many states have not had the capacity to distinguish same-sex divorce filings from heterosexual divorce filings. Additionally, judges in some states have been reluctant to consider divorce proceedings in a same-sex case, where the parties were married in a state that allowed gay marriage, but are seeking divorce in a different state. The Missouri Supreme Court only recently ruled that judges there had the authority to consider a divorce petition by a same-sex couple married in Iowa. The state’s ban on gay marriage was ruled unconstitutional in November, 2014, but the matter is still unresolved.

Contact Attorney Joanne E. Kleiner

Let us help you find a workable solution to a marital property dispute. Contact our office online or call us at 215-886-1266 to schedule a confidential consultation. We will help you stay focused on the issues that matter.

Jun 03

Same-Sex Marriage State-by-State

An Overview of State Laws on Same-Sex Marriage

Hands and rainbowAs of February, 2015, 37 states and the District of Columbia have all either formally legitimized gay marriage or plan to do so. Thus far, federal courts have dealt with the 14th Amendment issues raised by proponents of gay marriage on a state-by-state basis. In January, 2015, however, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear arguments on whether the 14th Amendment requires all states to allow same-sex marriage. A decision is expected this year.

Public opinion on same-sex marriage has shifted dramatically in the last 15 years. In 2000, a poll showed that only 35% of people thought gay marriage should be legal. In 2014, a similar poll found 55% of Americans in favor of gay marriage.

A look at the history of gay marriage in the United States shows an interesting phenomenon—the response to the decision by the Massachusetts Supreme Court in 2003, allowing gay marriage in the state, was reactionary. Before that decision, only two states had constitutional bans on gay marriage. The year following that decision, 14 more states added constitutional bans, and as recently as 2012, nearly 30 states banned same-sex marriage. Currently, 15 states have constitutional amendments defining marriage to be between a man and a woman, but those proscriptions are rapidly falling under 14th Amendment arguments.

Geographically, the remaining constitutional bans are primarily clustered in the southern states—Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas, Kentucky, Tennessee, Mississippi and Georgia still have bans, whereas Florida, the Carolinas, Virginia, West Virginia, Oklahoma and Kansas allow gay marriage. Missouri’s law was invalidated in late 2014 and Alabama’s ban was ruled unconstitutional earlier this year.20. The Dakotas ban the practice, but Nebraska’s constitutional provision was recently struck down. In addition, Michigan and Ohio remain legally opposed to gay marriage.

Contact the Law Office of Joanne E. Kleiner & Associates

Let us help you successfully resolve your family law problems. To schedule an appointment with an experienced Pennsylvania family law attorney, contact our office online or call us at 215-886-1266.

Next Page »

Footer

How can we help?

Please complete the form below and we will contact you.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

From Our Blog

  • The principle of equitable distribution in a Pennsylvania divorce
  • Divorce and Social Security retirement benefits
  • The effect of a gray divorce on your older children
  • Some tax matters associated with divorce
  • Some losses that divorce might cause

Site Info

Home  |   Practice Areas  
Firm Overview
Attorney  |  Blog  |  Contact

Social Media

FacebookTwitterLinkedin

Law Office of Joanne Kleiner | 261 Old York Rd., Ste. 402 | Jenkintown, PA 19046
215-886-1266
Map and Directions

© 2023 Joanne Kleiner. Disclaimer | Sitemap

The Best Lawyers of America Best Law Firms Award Winner Logo